Monday, October 4, 2010

Giving Thanks

Through most of high school I wanted to be a doctor. I’m not quite sure why; no one in my family was in medicine. I was fascinated by the human body, though, and being a doctor seemed the right outlet for that. It was only during senior year that my interests gravitated more toward the wider natural world and plants in particular.

Medicine and human disease fit in well with a teenage boy’s interest in all things bizarre. I was especially fascinated by leprosy, perhaps because there’s a whole chapter on it in Leviticus. My dad had a persistent case of psoriasis, no doubt aggravated by tensions at church (I understand that better now!), providing grist for my adolescent imagination. At that time leprosy was a disease that spread mysteriously and was difficult to cure. It still is; the leprosy bacteria, like those causing tuberculosis, have a waxy coating that protects them from the immune system.

Lepers were social pariahs in Israel. Their skin condition made them ritually unclean, and by the purity codes of the Torah, everything they touched was made unclean. So they had to live outside town and “wear torn clothes and let the hair of [the] head be disheveled” and cry out “Unclean, unclean” (Leviticus 13:45). That way everyone would know to avoid them.

The ten lepers whom Jesus encountered were doing their part. They made sure that they didn’t get too close. They raised their voices and shouted at him. But instead of crying “Unclean!” they pleaded for mercy. Jesus, never one to turn down a cry for help, told them to show themselves to the priests, the first step in getting back a passport to human society. In faith the lepers ran off and found that they were suddenly whole again.

Only one turned back to thank Jesus, falling at his feet. And he was a Samaritan, the Greek emphasizes. An outsider. A foreigner. Jesus said to him, “Were not ten cleansed? And the nine are where? Were they not found returning to give thanks to God except this foreigner?” To that foreigner who came back, Jesus said, “Arise and go; your faith has saved/rescued/delivered you/made you well.”

I always wondered what happened to the other nine. Did they come back sheepishly, apologizing and hanging their heads? Did they blow the whole gratitude thing off? Did their leprosy return because of that? I sometimes get so focused on what isn’t in the story that I miss what’s really there.

And what is really there are several remarkable words: eleison, euchariston, and sesoken: have mercy, give thanks, have been saved. Two of those words have made it into our liturgy. The lepers ask Jesus for mercy and he gives it to them – but mercy’s effects are not apparent until they step out in faith, believing that they will receive it. The proper response to receiving mercy is thanksgiving, which we give weekly in the Eucharist. And through the grace of receiving mercy and the act of thanking God in the power of the Holy Spirit, we are saved. Well, not exactly. Jesus tells the Samaritan that his faith has saved him. It is faith that saves us, not what we do – although clearly God expects a faithful response to God’s love.

One of those faithful responses is discerning a vocation, a calling from God. By the time I graduated from college I knew that I was called to teach botany. Some years later I discerned another call, one to preach the Word. Is there another vocation yet in the future? I doubt it. But I will continue to ask for God’s mercy, to give thanks for what God has done, and to step out in faith. It has led me well thus far, and I expect that it will continue to do so.


Pentecost 20: Luke 17:11-19.

5 comments:

Stacy A. Cordery said...

Nooooooooo!!!! Here it is again! The same problem from last week! Jesus said "Go, show yourselves to the priests." And nine of them did EXACTLY what he said to do. And why not? This man was so powerful that he cured them of one of the worst diseases going. And, he cured them as they were doing precisely what he bade them do. One guy was so flummoxed that he turned around to say thanks. Was that disobeying? What that responding to the voice of God within? I always assumed the other nine came back to convey their gratitude AFTER they'd done what that impossibly powerful healer told them to do.

Honestly! I know I sound like a poster child for the Pharisees, but when I was younger this story was the same as the talents story, or like the prodigal son. Here's nine people who do what they're told. The one who didn't got the goods. What does it mean to obey? How were the nine supposed to know to obey their hearts full of gratitude rather than the words of the eerily powerful Jesus?

I am not a cradle Episcopalian and one of the things that drew me to this church was the fact that one of those three legs on the three-legged stool was my own conscience and intellect.

Trees of the Field said...

Those passages must have bothered all dutiful children. They still do; several youth in the confirmation class spoke about the unfairness of the prodigal son story.

As for the lepers, the Samaritan may have been none too excited about showing himself to any Jewish priest. But does the fact that he didn’t do immediately what was asked make him less moral than the other nine? Remember the two sons whose father asked them to work in the vineyard. It was the one who said “No!” but went that did the father’s will. The Samaritan must have eventually visited the priest. Otherwise, he wouldn’t be allowed back in society.

It all comes back to duty, doesn’t it? I looked the word up in The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Ethics and found this: Duty “means a motive or principle of conduct that serves as an indication of the individual person’s moral quality.” For Kant, duty was a fundamental principle. “Duty as a motive implies the existence in the moral self of counterfactors or temptations that stand opposed to, or in some way obstruct, the performance of duty.” In other words, using our God-given free will to avoid temptations and perform our duty is an indication of our moral quality.

Duty as the fundamental motive for action has been criticized because it seems to leave no place for action motivated by love. That is precisely the tension you have identified. The tenth leper immediately returned out of thankful love. The two talent-keepers who loved their master made more money for him, but the fearful one was unable to do anything but follow instructions to the letter. The dutiful son resented the unconditional love shown to the wastrel (“that son of yours” instead of “my brother” is the most telling part of the story).

My sense is that Jesus emphasized unconditional love to counteract the pharisaical emphasis on duty for duty’s sake. Like the prophets, Jesus called people back to God’s law and away from their emphasis on human law, which often arose from putting something else in the place of God. No wonder the Pharisees had it in for him!

The very fact that we can have this conversation shows how important human reason is to that three-legged stool. If we were only using the Bible or tradition I’d be able to say “It’s this way and that’s that.” But as Episcopalians, we don’t have to check our brains at the door.

Trees of the Field said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Trees of the Field said...

Somehow two copies of my reply showed up, so I deleted the second.

Stacy A. Cordery said...

Fr. Horn--thank you for your very helpful response. I sincerely appreciate the time and thought. I'd continue with this conversation here, but I fear that since none of your other readers have chimed in to comment, what interests me must not be of wider relevance. So I'll put in a plug for others to chime in here, since the beauty of a blog is that we all benefit from each others' ideas and interpretations.